When Small Questions Hide Big Fears: Indirect Communication in Relationships

Reebs and me—proof that sometimes relationships don’t need the layers of ambiguity my blog is about.

Two people made plans in the spring to go to a concert that summer. Months later, one of them asked, “Do you still want to go to that concert with me?”

The other replied, “I don’t even remember when it is.”

That short exchange doesn’t sound dramatic on its face. One person checking in, the other admitting they forgot the date. But beneath the surface, a lot more was happening. In that one moment, we see how a small, casual question can actually carry big emotional weight—and how an ambiguous answer can wound more deeply than either person intended.

The Disguised Question

At first glance, Person A was just asking about a concert. But if we listen closer, it wasn’t really about tickets, timing, or logistics. It was about connection. The deeper, unspoken questions sounded more like this:

• Do you still want to spend time with me this summer?

• Am I still part of your plans?

• Do you still choose me?

But Person A didn’t say any of that directly. They disguised it inside a small, safe question about the concert. Why? Because underneath was a fear of rejection. Asking outright—“Do you still want to make time for me?”—felt too risky. If the answer was no, the wound would be sharp and clear. Safer, then, to ask indirectly and hope the deeper reassurance slipped out.

The Literal Answer

Person B responded with what was true for them in the moment: “I don’t even remember when it is.”

On the surface, that’s a simple, honest answer. It doesn’t mean Person B doesn’t care—it just means the concert wasn’t top of mind. After all, it was still months away.

But notice what Person B did not say:

• They didn’t say yes.

• They didn’t say no.

• They didn’t add reassurance or warmth.

They stayed narrow, literal, factual.

The Collision of Ambiguity and Honesty

Put those two pieces together—Person A’s ambiguous question and Person B’s blunt honesty—and you get a recipe for misalignment.

• Person A asked sideways, hoping for an indirect “yes, I want you.”

• Person B answered directly, but only to the words, not to the subtext.

• Person A walked away feeling rejected.

• Person B may have walked away thinking nothing significant had happened.

It’s like Person A whispered under their breath, “I love you, do you love me?” and Person B, not hearing it, said, “What are you talking about?” For Person A, that silence felt like a rejection—even though Person B never actually said no. Thus the challenge of indirect communication in relationships.

The Counselor’s Chair

Imagine a counselor (Person C) sitting with both of them. The summary might sound like this:

“Person A, your question carried more weight than you admitted. You were really asking about closeness, about whether this relationship is still important, but you disguised it in a question about a concert. Person B, you answered honestly about what you remembered, but because you didn’t add reassurance, your answer landed cold. So Person A felt hurt, not just by your words, but by the mismatch between what they hoped for and what you gave.”

That’s the heart of it: a mismatch in levels. One person speaking from hidden emotional need, the other responding to surface-level logistics.

The Resistance

Now, if the counselor were to recommend changes, both might resist in their own ways.

• For Person A: The recommendation would be to ask more directly. To risk clarity by saying, “I want to make sure we’re still spending time together. This concert matters to me. Do you want to go?”

  • Their resistance? Fear. “If I say it that directly, they might really say no. At least with ambiguity, I can protect myself.”

• For Person B: The recommendation would be to add warmth to their honesty. To say, “I don’t remember when it is, but yeah, I’d like to go,” or even, “I forget the date, but I still want to be there with you.”

  • Their resistance? Frustration. “Why do I have to sugarcoat? Why isn’t my plain answer enough? I don’t want to fake enthusiasm I don’t feel.”

So both sides protect themselves—A by being indirect, B by being literal—and both end up missing each other.

The Universal Lesson: Indirect Communication in Relationships

Most of us do this. We ask sideways questions when we’re really fishing for reassurance. We hide our vulnerable needs inside safe containers, hoping someone will read between the lines. And when the other person doesn’t, we feel let down, sometimes even rejected.

The truth is: ambiguity almost always breeds ambiguity.

If you ask a small question when you really mean a big one, you’ll often get a small answer. And then the hurt isn’t just from the other person—it’s from the way you under-asked yourself in the first place.

Moving Forward

So what does healthy communication look like here?

• For the Person A’s of the world: Practice saying the thing you really mean. Yes, it feels risky. Yes, it exposes you. But it also gives you the best chance of getting the reassurance you actually want.

• For the Person B’s of the world: Practice adding relational warmth, even when your literal answer is neutral. It doesn’t mean faking feelings—it means recognizing that how you say something matters as much as what you say.

• And for both: Remember that a little more clarity + a little more care can go a long way in preventing unnecessary wounds.

• 
  

Closing Reflection

Where in your life are you asking about concerts when what you really want to ask is about connection?

What small, “safe” questions are you using to cover up the big, vulnerable ones?

And how would your relationships change if you dared to speak directly—not with shame, but with courage—about what you actually need?

Because sometimes, the difference between feeling rejected and feeling reassured is as simple as asking the real question in the first place.